Canadian moral test questions
Have friends say so, Canada's largest electrical retailer
ladies bags is recruiting one, I went in looking go. However, large companies have big companies follow the rules, to
hermes bag enter the company must first pass an ethics test. I picked
fashion handbags up a pen to take place overnight.
Who knows the first two days, he was told: not been tested. How can? I hurriedly found an old immigration advice, do not have question, one question only sigh Canadian and Chinese people, culture, even worse in
louis vuitton bag other days. In the past number of years you work, the company has not won
gucci handbags anything
handbags without permission go home? A: never; B: the value of not more than 5 yuan; C: the value of not more than 20 yuan; D: a value not more than 100 yuan .
prada wallets Job in the unit, how can the company never took things back home? So option A
miu miu bag is certainly a trap that it elected only dishonest people, so I choose this news a total of B, without hesitation. The second question: Are you one of my colleagues took the company a dollar and
bags not to declare, you are the boss
gucci bag think
wholesale jewelry the following is appropriate? A: criticism; B: prevent it from upgrading or to give its demotion; C: dismissed; D: alarm, prosecution of the employee.
According to my own mind, select A and B also is understandable, Choice C has been excessive, D are not considered. But
louis vuitton I know that Canadians may be more important this sort of thing, so
miu miu wallet unconscionable selected C. The third question: Do you buy
prada bag things at the store go home, watch one salesperson, land you a dollar, you will drive back to back to him? (Driving the cost
louis vuitton purses of over 1 million). At that time, I think this is a trap, someone would really do such things? Say it is not Chinese people have been confused money shoring it? Election was not, at
bag that time was
handbags uk very much his own good faith are touched by a lot.
We all know the results: The first question can not win the election; the second question should be prosecuted (in Canada, even if the document is using the company's go home go overtime, after the prior director must
fashion jewelry also consent, otherwise very serious nature, belong to theft, the company should be fully prosecuted, let alone a dollar of cash); the third question should be are also back.
Next Archive:
Free son of a fox than a wolf and the superiority of
Last Archive:
Enough part of people satisfied with